| Back
Companies are hiring coaches to teach
executives how to sharpen management skills and communicate
effectively
By Diane E. Lewis, Globe Staff, 11/26/2000
When an executive coach suggested that
Bob Garland change his speaking style, the senior manager
for Deloitte & Touche was taken aback. The idea
that a veteran with his experience needed to liven up
his onstage presence seemed preposterous.
"Why should I have to do that?" Garland wondered.
"I'm a good speaker already. I've given 300 to
400 speeches over the last 20 years."
But the national managing partner of assurance and advisory
services changed his mind after a role playing session
with coach Kathy Lubar, cofounder of The Ariel Group
in Cambridge. By working with Lubar he realized how
cerebral his speeches were and, well, downright boring.
A year later, Garland is both a better speaker and a
convert: He now requires that his management committee
participate in coaching sessions to learn how to communicate
more effectively with their staffs and prospective clients.
Teaching company brass how to loosen up and be more
human is not the only reason companies turn to executive
coaches. Employers are also retaining coaches to assist
with everything from pre-IPO roadshow presentations
to helping despotic managers with potential control
themselves and their tempers.
Coaching is now often a prerequisite to promotion, an
intense leadership training course for talented people
who need assistance smoothing a few rough edges. Typically,
the coachee is a chief executive, a division head, or
a highly regarded employee earning a minimum of $100,000
to $250,000 per year.
"Employers are really seeking to sharpen the leadership
skills of high potential individuals," said Betty
Bailey, practice leader and senior vice president of
the New England division of Manchester Consulting. "So,
they are hiring individuals to head executive development.
This person is in charge of helping to create the next
leader."
When Manchester Consulting surveyed 200
companies this year, it found that 59 percent offer
coaching to managers and top executives, up from about
29 percent a decade ago. Eighty-six percent hired a
coach to sharpen the leadership skills of high potential
employees, 72 percent used one to correct behavior problems
that interfered with performance, 64 percent wanted
to ensure the success of newly promoted managers, and
58 percent wanted to help technical employees gain the
leadership skills needed to work with a broad range
of people and issues.
Many coaches hold degrees in business management, or
industrial psychology, but not all. Ariel Group's Lubar
and her cofounder, Belle Linda Halpern, are trained
actors who teach buttoned-down executives how to relax,
tune in to their emotions, and become more at ease socially.
"Some people are born with the desire to be big,
to be seen and noticed," Halpern said. "They
have natural charisma. Others are bombastic and take
up too much space. We believe presence can be developed,
and we believe that there is a way to make other people
feel listened to and heard."
The Ariel Group charges $12,000 for a two-day coaching
program, with two facilitators, or $1,500 per month
to coach an individual for an hour each week. The company
also sends individual coaches to special events where
they help executives prepare for special presentations
and combat stage fright.
Lubar recently worked with a woman who was terrified
of speaking in public, but public speaking was a part
of her job. The client insisted that Lubar sit backstage
with her. "We worked on breathing techniques and
did basic meditation and deep breathing," Lubar
said. "We also worked on visualization, and I suggested
that she imagine being in good hands."
Not all executives are eager to be coached. Deloitte
& Touche's Garland was skeptical about changing
his speaking style - until he saw himself in action.
"Bob Garland was a pretty dry speaker," recalled
Lubar. "He was an accountant and auditor, very
numbers-oriented, very blunt. And he spoke in a monotone,
with no drama or flare.
"At the same time, he was very confident and comfortable
with himself. So, I encouraged him to tell stories about
his family, to use props and metaphors. We prepared
by doing Shakespeare, by role-playing and improvising."
The technique worked. Garland, whose firm grades its
managers on their presentations on a scale of one to
six, had routinely garnered a four. Now, he says, his
ratings are higher.
"I thought I was a good speaker," Garland
said. "Now, I realize that was not the case at
all. What I've learned is that only 15 percent of an
effective speech is content-related. The rest is delivery,
style, and emotional involvement."
More companies are also hiring coaches to help managers
cope with difficult employees, maintains Mel Epstein,
founder of Leverage Thinking, a management consulting
firm in Cambridge.
Ten years ago, such workers were cast adrift in the
first wave of layoffs. Nowadays, with unemployment hovering
at 2.4 percent in Massachusetts, employers are more
interested in ironing out conflicts than handing out
pink slips, Epstein said.
"Coaches are in demand," he noted. "Paradoxically,
greater skills are required from managers because of
the economy. Companies want to hold onto people, not
lose them. So, managers who can work with problem employees
are valued and coaches are being hired to help develop
those skills."
|